NL
EN
FR
Belgium
Back to articles

Court of Cassation confirms the personal disciplinary liability of each individual real estate agent, including those operating within a real estate group

January 14, 2026

By judgment of 18 December 2025, the Belgian Court of Cassation delivered a significant ruling in a disciplinary (disciplinary law / professional disciplinary proceedings) case against a real estate agent, with far-reaching consequences for the real estate profession.

Court of Cassation confirms the personal disciplinary liability of each individual real estate agent, including those operating within a real estate group

The case concerned the scope of the disciplinary liability of a real estate agent practicing within a larger real estate group.

The Court expressly confirmed a cornerstone of Belgian professional disciplinary law: any natural person registered as a real estate agent with the Belgian Institute of Real Estate Agents (BIV / Institut Professionnel des Agents Immobiliers) is personally and individually subject to disciplinary jurisdiction and remains fully liable under the applicable deontological rules for his or her professional conduct.

Such disciplinary liability cannot be transferred to, diluted by, or absorbed into the legal personality, internal organization, or hierarchical structure of a organization within which the professional activities are performed.


The case

For several years, a real estate agent had managed client files within his own office.

Following the acquisition of that office by a large real estate group, he continued his activities as a self-employed collaborator within that structure.

Following complaints relating, inter alia, to:

  • irregular contracts,
  • administrative shortcomings,
  • non-compliance with the professional rules,

disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him by the BIV.

The Chamber of Appeal had acquitted him on the grounds that the director of the real estate group had presented himself as the “deontologically responsible person” and had taken steps to remedy certain shortcomings.


Court of Cassation: responsibility cannot be outsourced

The Court of Cassation annuls that decision.

The Court held in clear terms that the fact that another real estate agent, a director, or a real estate group presents itself as the deontologically responsible party, or remedies certain shortcomings, has no bearing on the personal disciplinary liability of the agent who committed the infringements.

Disciplinary responsibility is:

  • personal,
  • non-transferable, and
  • attached to the agent’s registration with the BIV, rather than to the internal structure of the office or organization within which he operates. 


Why this judgment is so important?

This judgment puts an end to a practice whereby individual real estate agents could shield themselves behind:

  • a group structure,
  • a corporate vehicle, or
  • a formally designated “responsible person”, such as a director of the office within which they operate as self-employed collaborators.

The Court of Cassation makes it clear

The disciplinary court must assess the conduct of the individual who performed the act, rather than the organisational chart of the office.

This applies even where the agent:

  • is not a director,
  • acts under instructions,
  • or forms part of a larger network.


Implications for the sector

For real estate offices and groups, this means that:

  • each registered real estate agent bears their own disciplinary risk;
  • internal compliance structures do not shield agents from personal sanctions.

For clients, this means that:

  • they may hold the specific real estate agent who handled their file directly accountable;
  • and not merely an anonymous corporate entity.


Conclusion

The Court of Cassation thereby confirms a fundamental principle of the real estate profession:
Disciplinary liability is personal. Any individual acting as a real estate agent remains personally responsible for their conduct, regardless of the office or organizational structure in which they operate.

For a comprehensive overview of the legislation governing the real estate sector in Flanders and Brussels, you can consult the new “Vastgoedcodex“, published in collaboration with KnopsPublishing.
Buy a copy (print or download – Dutch) here: https://nl.knopspublishing.be/shop/boeken/burgerlijk-recht/vastgoedcodex-vlaanderen-brussel-2025-2026/


For more information on this topic, you can always contact the Real Estate team at Andersen in Belgium.
Ulrike Beuselinck (Partner – Mediator) & Koen De Puydt (Managing Partner)

tags
administrative shortcomings, court of cassation, irregular contracts, real estate agent, real estate group

Discover more about this topic?

I am looking for a specialist in

See more articles

Serial Returners: When Consumer Protection Becomes Consumer Abuse

23.06.2026

Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium

Serial Returners: When Consumer Protection Becomes Consumer Abuse

The growth of e-commerce has fundamentally transformed consumer behaviour. To encourage online purchasing, retailers have progressively introduced customer-friendly policies: free delivery, free returns, extended return periods, and no-questions-asked refunds.

Read the article »
Jan Ghysels joins Andersen European Energy Industry Group Meeting in Frankfurt
NEWS FROM THE FIRM

11.06.2026

NEWS FROM THE FIRM

Jan Ghysels joins Andersen European Energy Industry Group Meeting in Frankfurt

Our Partner Jan Ghysels recently took part in the Andersen European Energy Industry Group Meeting, hosted by Andersen in Germany in Frankfurt. The meeting brought together colleagues from across the Andersen network, as well as industry professionals and guest speakers active in key areas of the global energy sector.

Read the article »
Bill Proposes Cap on Real Estate Agents’ Commissions

09.06.2026

Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium

Bill Proposes Cap on Real Estate Agents’ Commissions

Access to the housing market in Belgium has been under increasing pressure for some time. Sale prices continue to rise, rental prices are following the same trend, and significant additional costs are often incurred on top of these amounts. One such cost is the commission charged by real estate agents, for which no statutory maximum currently exists.

Read the article »
How far does a judge’s duty extend to examine ex officio whether a contested tax assessment can be upheld?

05.06.2026

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

How far does a judge’s duty extend to examine ex officio whether a contested tax assessment can be upheld?

In a judgment dated 21 May 2026, the Belgian Supreme Court addressed two significant procedural issues in tax matters.

Read the article »